After Islamabad Talks Stall, Europe Prepares Postwar Hormuz Security Plan Without U.S.

📌 Key Facts

• High‑level U.S.–Iran talks in Islamabad — led for the U.S. by Vice President J.D. Vance (with envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner) and for Iran by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf and FM Abbas Araghchi — were historic, lasted roughly 21 hours, and ended without an agreement after Iran would not give the U.S. an "affirmative commitment" to forswear nuclear weapons; Washington says it left a "final and best offer."
• The core negotiating gaps were nuclear and security red lines: the U.S. demanded concrete limits (including handover/removal of highly enriched uranium and proposals such as a long suspension of enrichment), while Iran insisted on lifting sanctions, release of frozen assets (reportedly about $27 billion), compensation for war damage, cessation of Israeli strikes in Lebanon, and sovereign control/fees for passage through the Strait of Hormuz (reports of a de facto $2 million toll per tanker).
• After Islamabad talks stalled, President Trump ordered a U.S. naval blockade-style posture focused on interdicting vessels entering or departing Iranian ports and coastal areas (while publicly saying transits to/from non‑Iranian ports would not be impeded); CENTCOM said mine‑clearing destroyers transited the strait to begin operations and the blockade became effective, though Iran and independent ship‑tracking reports disputed or showed some ships moving despite U.S. claims.
• Iran had already been exercising effective control over the Strait of Hormuz during the conflict — selectively allowing some tankers (notably to Asia), threatening mine‑laying and attacks, and reportedly operating a "toll booth" regime that dramatically reduced normal transits and choked global oil and LNG flows.
• European governments and the EU began drafting a postwar, multinational effort to reopen and secure the Strait of Hormuz without placing European vessels under U.S. command: Britain has drawn up plans and convened partners, France (Emmanuel Macron) described a European mission for after the war, and Germany signaled it may join — even as many Europeans said they would not put forces in harm’s way while hostilities continue and preferred diplomatic options now.
• The military campaign continued in parallel: U.S. and Israeli forces repeatedly struck Iranian military targets (including anti‑ship missile sites and facilities on Kharg Island), the U.S. deployed additional Marines, paratroopers and ships to the region, multiple U.S. aircraft have been lost or damaged with at least one F‑15E crew rescued in a complex operation, and CENTCOM publicly quantified thousands of targets struck — while Iran and Iran‑aligned proxies kept launching missiles, drones and strikes at Israel, Gulf states and shipping.
• A fragile, mediator‑brokered two‑week ceasefire briefly paused wider U.S.–Iran hostilities but was contested from the start (Israel said it did not apply to Lebanon/Hezbollah and continued operations there; Iran and Gulf states reported violations); the ceasefire’s differing public interpretations and continued cross‑border strikes complicated Islamabad negotiations and the durability of any deal.
• The human and economic toll is substantial and rising: thousands of civilians and combatants have been killed across Iran, Lebanon, Israel and Gulf states (counts vary by source), millions displaced, regional infrastructure and shipping disrupted, and global energy markets severely affected — Brent and WTI traded well above pre‑war levels and U.S. pump prices rose (U.S. national averages nearing or above $4/gal), with markets volatile as diplomacy and military measures unfolded.

📰 Source Timeline (240)

Follow how coverage of this story developed over time