California Bill Would Give Teachers Paid Leave After Pregnancy Or Abortion
The California Assembly approved Assembly Bill 65, which would create up to 14 weeks of state-funded pregnancy disability leave for public school teachers and explicitly covers termination of pregnancy, raising the prospect of paid leave for abortions.[1]
The measure passed the Assembly on a bipartisan 62-vote margin and now heads to the state Senate for further debate and possible amendments.[1] Supporters say the change is needed because teachers are excluded from California's State Disability Insurance program and lack a comparable statewide benefit.[1]
On December 3, 2024, Assemblymember Aguiar-Curry introduced AB 65, a bill co-sponsored by the California Teachers Association to create a separate benefit modeled on State Disability Insurance. Earlier proposals in 2018 and 2019 were vetoed by Governors Brown and Newsom, and a similar CTA-backed measure stalled in the Senate during 2023-24 after collecting about 20,000 supporting signatures. Many districts have required pregnant teachers to use accrued sick leave or to reimburse the district for substitute costs when they are absent.
California had about 286,000 public school teachers in the 2024-25 school year. The bill's explicit reference to leave for "termination of pregnancy" has drawn attention and sharpened debate over whether state-funded teacher benefits should cover elective abortions.[1]
The mainstream summary notes the bipartisan support for Assembly Bill 65 but does not address the broader implications of this legislative move in the context of the post-Dobbs landscape. The 2022 Supreme Court decision has allowed states like California to expand reproductive benefits, reflecting a divergence in policies based on partisan control, which is crucial for understanding the motivations behind this bill. The California Teachers Association argues that the estimated cost of providing 14 weeks of leave would be only $6 annually per taxpayer, a detail that highlights the financial feasibility of the proposal, which the mainstream account does not mention. This cost-effectiveness could play a significant role in garnering further support for the bill as it moves to the Senate for debate and potential amendments.
Additionally, while the summary emphasizes the need for equitable benefits for teachers, it overlooks the growing trend in progressive states to enhance paid family and pregnancy leave policies as a response to gender equity concerns and teacher retention amid shortages. This context suggests that the bill is not merely a local initiative but part of a larger movement to address systemic issues in public employee benefits, particularly for women, which the mainstream coverage fails to fully capture.
Show source details & analysis (1 source)
📊 Relevant Data
California had approximately 286,000 public school teachers in the 2024-25 school year.
Teachers in California — Ed-Data
The total estimated cost to provide 14 weeks of pregnancy leave for California educators would be the equivalent of $6 annually per taxpayer.
Fully Fund Our Schools: Establish paid pregnancy leave for educators — California Teachers Association
📌 Key Facts
- Assembly Bill 65 would provide up to 14 weeks of state-funded pregnancy disability leave for California public school teachers.
- The bill’s text explicitly includes leave for "termination of pregnancy," raising the prospect of paid leave for elective abortions.
- The measure passed the California Assembly with 62 bipartisan votes and now heads to the state Senate for further debate and possible amendments.
- Teachers are currently excluded from California’s State Disability Insurance program, which is a key rationale cited for creating this separate benefit.
📰 Source Timeline (1)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time